User talk:MoogleDan

Upgrades!

Hi Dan,

I plan on starting the process of updating the wiki to the current trunk (0.14ish as of this writing). I don't know how to make the wiki understand that .14 is not a future version. Can you convince it for me? Feedmeacat Oct 4 2013

NO, no, don't do that! The game's kind of awkward in that it has official releases, beta versions that will soon be official, and trunk, which contains stuff that may or may not be official ever. We keep pages at the official release version only (a lot of the players who use the wiki are those who play offline, and 0.12 is still the most recent thing a lot of them have played), and use the History section of pages to include both stuff that once was and stuff that soon will be. PLEASE don't just start dumping everything from History into the main pages! We'll be doing that up to 0.13 once it's out of beta, but I don't believe that's happening just yet. --MoogleDan (talk) 23:03, 5 October 2013 (CEST)

Okay! It seems that 0.13 has come out of beta. Are we clear to go on those updates? (By the way, after I posted here and before I saw your response, I had a rather long and involved and excessively in-depth conversation about what exactly stable vs beta vs trunk meant with the crawl dev IRC, and I felt silly about posting this here, and then classes started and I forgot this existed for a couple weeks... so we've come full circle. Sorry to alarm you) --Feedmeacat (talk) 21:39, 17 October 2013 (CEST)

Oh good, I was wondering where you ran off to and was worried my response had scared you away. Anyway, if you'll check this page you'll see everything that needs to be updated for 0.13. Most of us here have been caught up in the tournament and have pretty much neglected our duties, but once that's done we'll be back on the job. In the meantime, if you feel like updating some of those issues, definitely feel free and thank you! And if you're competing, good luck out there :D --MoogleDan (talk) 02:32, 18 October 2013 (CEST)

Bwijn

Hi Dan, plz have a look on Potion of experience and find out why File:SampleScreenForPotionOfExperience.jpg that I just uploaded won't appear. -- Bwijn 15:35, 21 February 2013 (CET)

The image is showing up on my screen, but as a thumbnail. The image link you're using includes, "|thumb=SampleScreenForPotionOfExperience-thumbnail.jpg"; if you remove that, it should show up at full size.

--MoogleDan 15:41, 21 February 2013 (CET)

Oops, I forgot about emptying the page cache. - Do you know crawl wiki image parameters to increase the size of the SampleScreenPic without blowing it up to full size? It should be readable. It's too tiny now. -- Bwijn 16:27, 21 February 2013 (CET)

I'm honestly pretty clueless about that sort of thing : / I'd suggest looking for another page that does a similar thing and stealing the code from that, or possibly asking CommanderC. He's got a much better grasp of the technical stuff than I do. --MoogleDan 16:34, 21 February 2013 (CET)

Deleting Pages

Hey Dan, I was wondering how to delete pages. I recently merged the Breathe Frost (and other elements) pages into Draconian breath attacks, and removed all text on the old pages, thinking that would delete them. Apparently, it didn't :P PS. I looked for it in the help section, but the page (like many other help pages) doesn't seem to exist. Are all those pages planned? I'd be fine with writing some of them --Lokkij 21:43, 8 April 2013 (CEST)

Only admins can permanently delete pages. If you want a page to be deleted, you can put Template:Delete on the page to mark it for deletion. MoogleDan or one of the other admins will then delete it when they come around. Often, however, pages that are merged and candidates for deletion are good candidates for redirects. For example Breathe Frost would be a good candidate for being redirected to Draconian breath attacks.

As for the help sections, they are somewhere on the new or old wiki but they haven't been updated in a while. You can definitely work on those pages if you like! --Flun 21:49, 8 April 2013 (CEST)

To prevent people from vandalizing the place too badly, we restrict deletion rights to the site admins. If you'd like to suggest the deletion of a page, just put a { {delete} } on the page (without the extra spaces) and we'll look into taking it down. One recommendation I have for this situation is that, instead of deleting the pages, we make them into redirects. That way, someone looking for an ability under its actual name won't find a dead end. We do delete things occasionally, but redirects are almost always the best approach.

As for the page you made, that looks like a good start, and much more useful than the pretty blatantly incorrect stub pages you're replacing :P I'd suggest adding the flavour text and tile icon next to each one, and damage details would be useful, but aside from that it's a solid arrangement. --MoogleDan 21:53, 8 April 2013 (CEST)

Regarding new images

So I was looking at the recent changes log, and noticed you did a thing where you uploaded the new image for royal jelly (under a different file name from the current one), deleted the old image, then moved the new image to the old file name. You do know you can just hit the "upload a new version of this file" option to take care of that in one step, right?

Plus, doing that leaves the old image in the image's history, which is handy for people like me who like adding to the Retired Artwork page. --spudwalt (talk) 00:02, 2 September 2013 (CEST)

Don't worry; if it had been a REAL old image, I would have done the Retired Artwork page step myself! I just did that when I realized that our royal jelly item image was pulling a dupe of the TRJ monster image. Nothing was actually lost. As for the multi-step process involved, I actually haven't fiddled with those tools too much; I'll give 'em a go once 0.13 lands and we have a mountain of artwork to move about. --MoogleDan (talk) 05:37, 3 September 2013 (CEST)

online comments

Sorry I haven't responded to your comments while online -- I tend to concentrate on the game, and I don't generally notice the little green text in the corner saying I have new messages. --spudwalt (talk) 04:29, 14 October 2013 (CEST)

It's perfectly fine, no harm done. Sorry for vanishing last night! My internet connection went spotty and I had to crash anyway. --MoogleDan (talk) 13:50, 14 October 2013 (CEST)

0.14 update project progress

What do you think about crossing out finished stuff on Current_projects/0.14_update_project to track the progress and add more motivation to finish it quickly? -- Derrek (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2014 (CEST)

I think it's an excellent way to track progress, and one which I have admittedly been ignoring :P I'll go through there later on and slash out what I've updated. Thanks for reminding me that that list exists! --MoogleDan (talk) 21:05, 29 April 2014 (CEST)

Flavour messages

Hello, please take a look at the discussion here, and tell what you think about it. -- Derrek (talk) 19:44, 26 May 2014 (CEST)

Character guides?

Hi MoogleDan. Can I ask? What became of your character guides? If memory serves, you had a few. Didn't you have a nice one on Centaurs? I was specifically looking for that when I realized I can't find any of em. --Buddy23Lee (talk) 23:39, 10 June 2014 (CEST)

I had a centaur one and a gargoyle one up for a while, true, but I eventually decided to drop them. They're both very easy species to play, so it's not like I'm depriving the world of any critical information here. Beyond that, I've largely stopped playing, so keeping them up to date would've been a hassle, and I started drawing flack from some of the nastier members of the Crawl community for some of the less optimal advice I gave. Honestly, it just wasn't worth the grief. --MoogleDan (talk) 02:03, 11 June 2014 (CEST)

Geeze, that's kinda rough, and a little disappointing, but I guess understandable. Clearly, you put in more than your share of good work here anyway. As someone who banks on giving less than optimal advice I think you should forget those mooks. A guide can be written with a spirit toward casual, fun gameplay and not just pure power gaming or something, but I digess. --Buddy23Lee (talk) 10:06, 11 June 2014 (CEST)