Difference between revisions of "Talk:Comestibles and satiation"

From CrawlWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(calculable?)
 
(Reply to Bwijn)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
I just read: eating some mutagenic chunk "Causes a random mutation". Is that accurate and reliable? If it is just one(!) random mutation it could be used to get rid of one pesky bad mutation without loosing the good ones. We know that a [[potion of mutation]] mostly gives 2-4 random mutations. And a [[potion of cure mutation]] removes 3-max 7 of them. No chance to calculate it. Any good experiences out there? -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] 22:08, 24 February 2013 (CET)
 
I just read: eating some mutagenic chunk "Causes a random mutation". Is that accurate and reliable? If it is just one(!) random mutation it could be used to get rid of one pesky bad mutation without loosing the good ones. We know that a [[potion of mutation]] mostly gives 2-4 random mutations. And a [[potion of cure mutation]] removes 3-max 7 of them. No chance to calculate it. Any good experiences out there? -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] 22:08, 24 February 2013 (CET)
 +
:It's always one mutation, and always random (unless it's rotten, in which case it's a bad mutation). While this may occasionally remove one of your current mutations, it's ALWAYS more likely to either give you a new one or do nothing at all. I can't say there's much tactical value to it. --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] 03:47, 25 February 2013 (CET)

Revision as of 04:47, 25 February 2013

Tactical use possible?

I just read: eating some mutagenic chunk "Causes a random mutation". Is that accurate and reliable? If it is just one(!) random mutation it could be used to get rid of one pesky bad mutation without loosing the good ones. We know that a potion of mutation mostly gives 2-4 random mutations. And a potion of cure mutation removes 3-max 7 of them. No chance to calculate it. Any good experiences out there? -- Bwijn 22:08, 24 February 2013 (CET)

It's always one mutation, and always random (unless it's rotten, in which case it's a bad mutation). While this may occasionally remove one of your current mutations, it's ALWAYS more likely to either give you a new one or do nothing at all. I can't say there's much tactical value to it. --MoogleDan 03:47, 25 February 2013 (CET)