Difference between revisions of "Ring of protection"
m (version bump) |
m (→Desirability) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
All characters benefit from more AC, but sacrificing a ring slot for it may or may not be a good idea. Unlike most [[amulet]]s, you can quickly swap rings, easily switching between them at need. | All characters benefit from more AC, but sacrificing a ring slot for it may or may not be a good idea. Unlike most [[amulet]]s, you can quickly swap rings, easily switching between them at need. | ||
| − | Rings of protection are stronger | + | Rings of protection are relatively stronger on characters with low AC. There's a somewhat larger difference between 5 and 9 AC compared to 25 and 29. In particular, characters that cannot wear some or all types of armour ([[Spriggan]]s, [[Ogre]]s, [[Troll]]s, [[Octopode]]s, [[Felid]]s) will appreciate having a ring of protection. |
==History== | ==History== | ||
Revision as of 19:47, 27 July 2023
Version 0.30: This article may not be up to date for the latest stable release of Crawl.
| Type | Jewellery |
|---|---|
| Name | Ring of protection |
| Icon | 
|
| A ring that protects its wearer from harm. |
A +4 ring of protection boosts the AC of the wearer.
Desirability
All characters benefit from more AC, but sacrificing a ring slot for it may or may not be a good idea. Unlike most amulets, you can quickly swap rings, easily switching between them at need.
Rings of protection are relatively stronger on characters with low AC. There's a somewhat larger difference between 5 and 9 AC compared to 25 and 29. In particular, characters that cannot wear some or all types of armour (Spriggans, Ogres, Trolls, Octopodes, Felids) will appreciate having a ring of protection.
History
- Prior to 0.27, you could find rings of protection with a -4 enchantment; such rings were always cursed.
- Prior to 0.25 enchantments were random values between 1 and 6 (positive and negative).
